home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: goliath.apana.org.au!amioz!perrym
- From: perrym@amioz.apana.org.au (Perry Mowbray)
- Message-ID: <31289157@amioz.apana.org.au>
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.misc
- X-FTN-To: Peter Bornhall
- Subject: Re: MUI 3.2
- Date: 19 Feb 96 09:03:51 GMT
- Organization: AmiOZ BBS Australia <UUCP<->Fido gateway>
- X-GateSoftware: AmiGate 1.3a (24.3.95)
-
- In a message of 06 Feb 96 Peter Bornhall wrote to humpty@TOMATE.TNG.OCHE.DE:
-
- PB> In a message dated 06 Feb 96, humpty@TOMATE.TNG.OCHE.DE wrote to All:
-
- >>> Yes, MUI is slower than standard gadtools, but then again, just simply
- >>> having one pixel non-shaded frames for buttons is even faster, isn't it?
- >>> Nice features have a price, and the standard gadtools gui sucks compared
- >>> to what's on the other platforms today.
-
- hTT>> And do not forget to mention, that for MUI there is a nice interface
- hTT>> designer ! For GadTools as well, but show me how to do wit GT easyly
- hTT>> that what one might do with MUI.
-
- PB> And that is often something that is abused. I often see MUI programs
- PB> with a
- PB> GUI consisting of a couple of string gadgets, a button or two and
- PB> similar.
- PB> Then the lazy bugger who made it claims that it's too much work to do a
- PB> gadtools version of it. I'd say; Stay away from programming if it's
- PB> too much
- PB> work.
-
- Maybe someone should write a MUI->Gadtools programme to convert the gui
- code? (Not sure if that's possible?? - never programmed with MUI)
-
- Regards,
- PM
-
- **************************************************************************
- Perry Mowbray
- Email: perrym@amioz.apana.org.au
- FIDO: 3:713/817.7
- AmigaNet: 41:200/817.7
- **************************************************************************
-
-
-